![]() Repeatedly, the reader is subjected to descriptions of motives, thoughts or attitudes that can in no way be supported. Her lack of familiarity with the psychological or psychoanalytic literature is most evident in her discussions of anorexia.Beyond the psychological aspect, Hill fails to remain objective and rely upon a base of evidence. Other than to name a few sources, such as Freud, she fails to provide evidence in the narrative to support her claims. ![]() Hill relies upon outdated psychoanalytic concepts to explain various events. The perhaps greatest weakness is the attempt to wrap everything up in a pop psychology framework. Despite being described as a scholarly work, the material does not live up to that standard. I don't think I would be interested in reading something else by Francis Hill. Would you be willing to try another book from Frances Hill? Why or why not? I would very much enjoy listening to her again. ![]() Ms McCaddon is wonderful at reading the material. Would you try another book from Frances Hill and/or Wanda McCaddon? ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |